DavidHernandez

November 21, 2009

Join us in protecting Voters Rights

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidhernandez @ 4:26 am

Battle for Voters Rights begins in the

42nd State Assembly District

 

Who would have thought that my decision to run for the 42nd State Assembly District would give us such a Vital and Critical Opportunity? 

Of all the State Assembly Districts throughout California, we could not have foreseen that ours would be the battleground for the future of California.

As part of my platform I took the position and challenge to Preserve and Protect Prop 13. Little did I know that my opponent would lead the effort to eliminate it and would lead the Sacramento Based effort to remove the ability of voters to exercise their Constitutional Rights outlined In the First Amendment.

 The right to petition the government for redress of grievances.

It was by exercising this right that Prop 13 was placed on the Ballot giving voters the opportunity to make it into the Law of the Land. It was the Initiative Process that enabled Howard Jarvis and the men and women of California to collect signatures and get it on the Ballot.

With carefully crafted “safe districts” which insure connected politicians and their crews remain in power and millions of Special Interest funding, Assembly and Senate politicians have turned a deaf ear to the voters.

Our Founding Fathers were very clear and conscious of Governments ability to hold itself beyond the reach of the people.

Sacramento Politicians have taken the steps to protect themselves from the people of California. It is up to us to stop them. It has been given to us in the 42nd District, to answer the call. I believe we are up to the challenge and I believe this opportunity will be, like Prop 13 so vital an issue that our call to arms will be answered by voters throughout California.

 

Senate President pro Tem Darrel Steinberg and Assembly Speaker Karen Bass have formed the “Select Committees on Improving State Government”.

They will be addressing the issue of Ballot Box budgeting and the Initiative Process and will present Legislation to the Legislature for approval early next year.

According to Speaker Bass, “State government needs to be more transparent, efficient and effective. “ “Today’s hearing is the first step in the process toward reforming our system of government and making it work better for the people of California”.

More transparent and efficient?  More Effective? For whom?  For them not us.

The Initiative process is what is allowing voters to place the “Part Time Legislature” measure on the ballot in 2010. Now you see why they want to take this away from you?

They will also remove the 2/3rds vote requirement for passing the Budget. How will they do this? If they do not need a 2/3rds vote, they will balance the budget by raising your taxes. Getting rid of Prop 13 is the number one target by these political insiders.

Time is short; we must begin to alert California Voters and move them to action.  We must hold my opponent, the Chairman of the Select Committee Mike Feuer accountable. We must mount a campaign with the objective to remove him from not only from the committee but from office!

How can you help? What can you do?

Educate yourself and start talking to your friends and co workers. Help us raise the funding needed to organize and mobilize the troops. We need to be at every meeting the Select Committee holds and challenge them on their efforts to keep us out of the process.

            Make your contribution today, do not wait, time is Critical.

Go to www.davidhernandez4assembly.com and make a contribution to our campaign.

Join me as we take to battle to them!

David Hernandez, Candidate for State Assembly 2010 District 42

November 18, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidhernandez @ 10:22 pm

As a Candidate for the California State Assembly, I believe it is my duty to take a position on this Ballot Measure which will not only be on the 2010 Ballot but will have a direct impact on the office I am seeking.

 I have reviewed the information presented and the track record of States which have already adopted the “Part Time Legislature”.

 States with similar population, Quality of Life Issues and Challenges very similar to California have not only achieved or maintained parody with California but surpassed it.

I am therefore supporting this effort and will make it a part of my campaign platform.

 David Hernandez

 

INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO VOTERS

 

The Attorney General of California has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure:

 

REDUCES LEGISLATIVE SESSION AND PAY BY AT LEAST 50%. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL

AMENDMENT.

 

Reduces the Legislature’s regular session by more than 50% to no more than ninety-five days. Directs the Legislature to convene in January for up to thirty days and again in May for up to sixty days. Allows the Legislature to reconvene for up to five additional days to reconsider bills vetoed by the Governor. Requires that legislators’ salaries be

cut by at least 50%, regardless of the amount of work legislators perform. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Potential reduction in state costs of tens of millions of dollars per year, including over $5.7 million in reduced annual costs for legislator salaries. Actual reduction, if any, would depend on future actions of the Legislature and the Governor. (09-0031.)

 

 

 

 

To the Honorable Secretary of State of California: We, the undersigned, registered, qualified voters of California, residents of the County identified below, hereby propose amendments to the California Constitution, relating to the State Legislature and petition the Secretary of State to submit the same to the voters of California for their adoption or rejection at the next succeeding general election or at any special statewide election held prior to that general election or otherwise provided by law. The proposed constitutional amendments (full title and text of the measure) read as follows:

 

 

THE CITIZEN LEGISLATURE ACT

SECTION 1. Title.

This Act shall be known and may be cited as

“The Citizen Legislature Act.”

SECTION 2. Findings and Purposes.

 

The People of the State of California hereby make the following findings and declare that their purpose in enacting this Act is as follows:

 

(a) California’s experiment with a “fulltime”Legislature has failed. The result has been a Legislature dominated by career politicians

beholden to special interests. Legislators do not work “full-time” yet they receive full-time pay and benefits, more than double the amount of all other states. Yet, with all of these incentives, they continually fail to accomplish their most important job, passing a balanced state budget on-time.

 

(b) California needs and deserves a Legislature that is only interested in conducting the people’s business. Most states have a part-time

Legislature, including some of the largest and most populous. A part-time Legislature will replace professional politicians with citizen legislators and will break the stranglehold of special interests. It

will reduce the number of unnecessary and self serving bills and will result in a more responsibleand accountable government institution.

 

(c) In order to further these and the purposes stated in section 1.5, the people hereby amend the California Constitution to enact the “Citizen Legislature Act.”

 

SECTION 3. Constitutional Amendment

 

Section 3.5 of Article IV of the California Constitution is added to read as follows:

 

Sec. 3.5(a) The Legislature shall reconvene in regular session on the first Monday in January of each year for a period not to exceed 30 calendar days, whereupon the Legislature shall stand in recess. The Legislature shall reconvene in regular session on the first Monday in May for a period not to exceed 60 calendar days.

 

(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the

Legislature may reconvene for an additional period

of 5 days following recess or adjournment to reconsider bills vetoed by the Governor pursuant to section 10.

 

(c) On or before the end of the fiscal year 2012, the California Citizens Compensation Commission shall, pursuant to section 8 of Article III, reduce the annual salary of Members of the Legislature by at least fifty percent of the salary established for the fiscal year in which this section becomes effective. Thereafter, the Commission

may increase the annual salary of Members of the Legislature to account for any increase in the cost of living, and may reduce such salary at its discretion, pursuant to section 8 of Article III.

 

SECTION 4. Operative Date/Severability

 

(a) Section 3.5 shall become effectiveimmediately, however it shall become operative for the biennium session commencing on the first

Monday in December in 2012.

 

(b) If any part of this measure or theapplication to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other

provisions or applications which can reasonably be given effect without the invalid provision or application.

October 19, 2009

Fundraising campaign begins.

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidhernandez @ 2:56 am

David Hernandez for State Assembly Virtual Fundraiser begins.

On October 19, 2009 at 9:00AM we begin our first fundraising push via the internet. The fundraising effort will continue through Friday October 23rd at 5:00PM.

For those of you, who have not contributed to a political campaign before; allow me to give you some basic information.  First of all, contributions although vital are not Tax Deductible. Second, all contributions over the amount of one hundred dollars must be itemized on the candidates campaign finance statement. The information is public record and will need to show the contributors name, address, employer and occupation.

If the contribution is $99.00 or less, the contribution is not itemized and the contributor’s information is not made public.

There is a limit on the amount you can contribute. For State Assembly it is three thousand six hundred dollars per person, per election. You can contribute the maximum in the Primary and again in the General election. Remember no amount is too small. Every dollar will be much appreciated and treated with the respect it deserves.

That is the basic information on the rules of the game. Many have heard that “Money is the Mothers Milk of Politics”. This statement has proven to have merit. No matter how good your platform or message, without financial resources, the message can not get out to the voters.

There are two ways to contribute to the campaign. First you can contribute via the web site at www.davidhernandez4assembly.com.  Second, you can contribute via mail by sending your check made payable to David Hernandez for Assembly 2010, to PO Box 9158, North Hollywood, CA 91609 ID # 1318371

We have already laid out our strategy for an aggressive campaign. For the next six months we will be targeting our fundraising towards the Voter Registration Campaign. This will involve paying a “Bounty” to Republican Groups and Organizations who register Republican Voters in the 42nd District.

 So, let us begin and see how we fair in this troubled economy. I will post the results of the effort on Monday October 26, 2009.

Thank you,

 

David Hernandez

Candidate for the 42nd Assembly District

October 15, 2009

Last Man Standing; why it is wise and vital to invest in our campaign.

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidhernandez @ 7:09 pm

Last Man Standing; why it is wise and vital to invest in our campaign.

 

Running for State Assembly in a district where the voter registration is 146,000 Democrats to 48,000 Republicans is by any measure a challenge of epic scale.  We are not going into this race with any illusions. Our objectives are clear and our campaign will be aggressive.

Far too often these races are ignored by established party types as they see no reason to engage or spend resources in these districts.

As a result, the entrenched incumbent raises vast amounts of campaign contributions which are then donated to the DNC and to Candidates in other districts or states in targeted races. In the end the result is the same, we lose and lose ground.

It is no wonder the Republican registration has dropped to third place behind Decline to States in the 42nd District. The lack of effort on the local level has a detrimental and direct impact on the National level.

My objective and purpose in committing my time and resources in this campaign is clear.

First, build a solid foundation in the 42nd State Assembly District.

We have the ability to measure the success of our efforts and it is very simple, the voter registration numbers. Can we move the Republican Party registration in the 42nd District into the number 2 slot by November of 2010?

I believe that by raising funds to supplement the voter registration efforts of Republican groups like the Federated Women, The Westside Republican Club, The San Fernando Valley Republican Club, Southern California Republican Women and Men and The Hollywood Congress of Republicans, we will not only achieve our objectives but surpass them.

The College Republican groups will also play a vital role in this effort and have the energy and numbers to undertake this aggressive effort.

I will be focusing my immediate efforts on fund raising in order to implement this voter registration effort and pay bounty to these groups for new Republican voter registrations. I will be reaching out to other campaigns to join us in these efforts.

Second and most profound is the “Last Man Standing” objective and strategic offensive campaign.

The population of Los Angeles is now over four million residents.  Did you know there is only one Republican State Assembly member who represents any part of Los Angeles?

That Assemblyman is Cameron Smyth who represents the 38th District. That district includes Sunland Tujunga as well as the Santa Clarita Valley and points west.

The voter registration in the 38th District has now fallen to a mere 3.5 % difference with Republicans holding onto a very slim lead.

As a result, the opposition has targeted this district and a few others for the 2010 election. Get rid of the Republicans and you will have the 2/3rds vote to raise taxes and get rid of Prop 13.

Will Cameron Smyth be the last man standing? He already is!

What can we do? Sure support his campaign with money and volunteers, but we can do much more. We can force the opposition to spend some of their campaign war chest and volunteers in races like the 42nd Assembly race.

 No assembly race gets a free pass. They must be forced to engage and use resources! Our campaigns must be aggressive from the very start.

The Unions have already spent over $200,000.00 dollars against Cameron this year sending out hit mailers to tarnish his name and record.

This is the real deal folks.

Force them to engage and use their resources in other races.

 With our objectives clear and an aggressive campaign now under way, I am asking that you invest in the effort and make a contribution to my campaign at this time.

We need to alert, inform and engage the Republicans in each and every district. Help me and help Cameron by making sure he is still standing and still representing the 38th District after November 2010.

Please go to www.davidhernandez4assembly.com to contribute on line or Mail your check to the Committee to Elect David Hernandez for Assembly 2010, to PO Box 9158, North Hollywood, Ca 91609.  ID # 1318371

Campaign contributions are not tax deductible, but vital.

Thank you,

David Hernandez

Candidate for State Assembly, District 42

October 11, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidhernandez @ 4:03 pm

I believe we were absolutely correct in making English the Official Language of California.

The Gift of English

One of the current controversies facing our community and our country involves the English language. Why, people ask, should everyone have to learn English? Why print documents only in English? Why force applicants for citizenship to learn English?

Let me give my answer to this below. You will see how my  position on this issue is based on the knowledge that when we provide someone the opportunity to learn English we are not being domineering or insensitive. Instead we are giving them a gift. The gift of English.

How could it have happened that the language of one little island has spread around the world? England was no more imperialistic or conquering in the last few centuries than any other country. How was it possible to spread its language so far and wide?

The answer lies in the qualities of English itself. All languages are wonderful. All languages have unique characteristics. Many languages even have a particular quality that is better than the same quality in English. Some people, for example, feel that certain types of poetry can better be expressed in Spanish than in English. But the success of English is due to the fact that it has gathered in one language more useful characteristics than any other language on earth.

English is the most powerful, efficient, subtle and flexible language on earth. It was bound to occur that among the hundreds of languages developed by humans over the millennia, one would incorporate the largest group of desirable features. English just happened to be that language. Any other language that had been first to include all the benefits of English would have swept the world instead. English didn’t conquered the world because it was imposed more than any other language. It conquered the world because of its own inherent characteristics.

 The Characteristics of English

 Efficiency

Think of a company that produces a product more efficiently than its competitors. That company will outpace its competitors. The same is true of languages. English is the most efficient language on earth. It takes an average of 30% more space to express an idea in another language than in English. People who write text materials for translation into other languages have to leave 30% white space on a page to allow room for translation.

English achieves this efficiency in a number of ways. Native English speakers are so used to shortcuts, that they don’t even realize that not all languages offer them. For example, abbreviating a word or using an acronym for a group of words is not possible in all languages. Take this sentence for example:

      Mr. Smith’s newest shirts were Mrs. Smith’s birthday gift.

If you wanted to say that in another language it might go something like this:

      The shirts the most new of Mister Smith were the gifts of Mistress Smith on his yearly day of birth.

The ability to substitute “apostrophe s” for the word “of” shortens the sentence greatly. So does the option of saying Mr. instead of Mister. We shorten our sentences in other ways, too. Think of contractions such as doesn’t, haven’t, I’ll, he’s and John’s (for John is). Nor do all languages offer the ability to say ASAP, SASE, CBS, IRA, AKA.

Another characteristic that adds efficiency to English is its use of a writing system based on sounds. The number of sounds we use in English is far fewer than the number of concepts we can express. Some other fine languages are hampered by a system of writing which requires a different shape for every concept, rather than using a different shape for every sound.

Who knows? Maybe the efficiency of English was an unappreciated secret weapon in World War II. Since we were able to make all of our coded messages 30% shorter than those of the enemy, it would have given the enemy less opportunity to grab them out of the air. But theirs had to be 30% longer, which gave us more opportunity to detect their messages.

Flexibility

English is an amazingly flexible and adaptable language. It easily accepts words from other languages and makes them its own. Not all languages can comfortably do this. We can even create words ourselves and have them understood. Abbreviate “knock out” to “KO” and the following sentence is still easily comprehended: The winner KO’d the loser in the fifth round.

 Power and Subtlety

 Because of its ability to adopt words from other languages, English may have the largest vocabulary on earth. It contains close to half a million words. This makes English very powerful, and capable of expressing very subtle differences with great precision. This quality alone has been invaluable in the scientific domain.

Compare this to a certain Indian language in the southern U.S. It has only 400 words. This limited vocabulary forces speakers to do things like repeat a word in order to emphasize it, and say it three times in order to add more emphasis.

 Non-native speakers say that English is a difficult language. It’s generally assumed that this refers to its grammar. But basic English is actually one of the easiest languages in terms of grammar. Our verb endings are a cinch when compared to those of other languages, and we don’t have to make gender agreements on articles and adjectives.

The thing that makes English difficult is the same thing that gives it variability and precision: its huge vocabulary and large number of idioms. As one example, a slight change in a preposition following a verb totally changes the meaning of the verb. So novices can learn basic English easily, but power users never stop learning English.

 A Valuable Skill

 When we teach English to our immigrant students, we are not being dictators. When we ask potential citizens to learn English, we are not being insensitive and domineering. Instead, we are offering them a gift, the gift of English. We are giving them the most powerful communication tool on Earth. English is a popular language because it is a great language. We can be proud of using it.

September 24, 2009

The Campaign begins today!

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidhernandez @ 3:54 am

Greetings my friends and supporters,

The past months have been devoted to helping my friend in the Special Election for Los Angeles City Council District 2. That effort is now over and we can begin to focus on the 42nd AD race.  I will have my platform up on the web site next week. Rest assured it will be to your liking.

Thank You ,

David

April 28, 2009

Why support David Hernandez for Assembly

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidhernandez @ 10:49 pm

That’s a good question, especially since I will be asking you for your support in the form of endorsements, money, volunteer time and most importantly, your vote.

 

At every level of government, elected officials all too often reach for the “low hanging fruit” when attempting to demonstrate their concern for a challenge facing the community, city, county, state or nation.  Imposing more laws and restrictions on law abiding citizens has been the status quo for decades.

 

When such actions occur, these politicians will justify their actions in the name of the “greater good.”  They have also demonstrated their willingness to violate the California State Constitution to further their agenda and achieve their objectives.

 

Violating the California State Constitution is not just a matter of interpreting a document in Sacramento in a different light; to be determined by those with the resources to mount a legal challenge or defense. No, at the very core it is a violation of the constitutional rights of the citizens of California!

 

Yes, sometimes there are groups that step forward to challenge the actions of those politicians, but these challenges are limited and expensive. Those violating your rights have unlimited access to resources; your tax dollars and the money of the special interests who benefit, to help them defend the imposition of their agenda.

 

Do you really believe we need more laws to solve the challenges facing California?

Take a look at an existing group of California laws and ordinances.  California Law consists of 29 separate codes as shown here:   http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html

 

Now tell me our problem is a lack of laws.

 

I believe we have too many laws, many of which are not even followed.  Given the growth of the California state government and the tax dollars needed to feed this ever expanding beast; clearly more laws and more taxes are not the answer.

 

We cannot tax our way into financial stability.

 

The time has come for you to have someone representing you in Sacramento who will stand up and challenge the violations of your Constitutional rights.

 

Here is a link to the California State Constitution.  When elected I will do more than just take an Oath to up hold it. No, my friends, I pledge to you that I will fight to protect your Constitutional Rights from all who attempt to violate them.

 

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/const-toc.html

 

My name is David Hernandez and I am asking for your help and vote. Vote for me on June 8, 2010 to be the Republican nominee for State Assembly and help me then be elected on November 2, 2010, and you will have someone to challenge those who would violate your rights.

 

 

April 18, 2009

David Hernandez is now a Candidate for California State Assembly

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidhernandez @ 11:36 pm

To all my  friends and supporters,

Thank you for your confidence and support through out these many years.  We have worked side by side in various political and community efforts. We have raised public awareness from City Hall to the US House of  Representatives.

Together we continue to work for the betterment of our Community, City and Nation.

It is now time for us to work on bringing our values to the  California State Assembly. As such I would like to announce my campaign for the State Assemby, District 42.

The election will be in early 2010 and we begin today to raise the funds, volunteers and awareness to mount a viable campaign.

If you would like to volunteer on the campaign, please contact me at drhassoc@earthlink.net

If you can contribute to the campaign Mail your check to Committee to Elect David Hernandez PO Box 9158, North Hollywood, Californa 91609. ID#Pending. Please include your Name, Address, Occupation and Employer. Max Contribution is $2,300. Remember, contributions are not tax deductible but vital.

Thank You

David Hernandez

June 7, 2008

This issue is purely about horses!

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidhernandez @ 4:38 pm

Friends,

 

To Start – this issue is not about saving Malibu Valley Farms – we won that battle – this issue is purely about horses – please read.

 

On July 9, 2007, Malibu Valley Farms was granted a Coastal Development Permit from the California Coastal Commission.  Malibu Valley Farms is a 31-acre parcel, but only six acres are flat.  The horses and structures all sit on these six acres.  As part of the approval, Malibu Valley Farms offered to place an agricultural easement over the remaining 25 acres and the Commissioners asked that our offer be included in the permit. 

 

Eleven months later, Malibu Valley Farms is on the Coastal Commission agenda again for final approval of the Findings and Conditions for its permit.  We just received a copy of the Conditions and are very concerned over the language being proposed by the Coastal Commission Staff.  Basically, Staff has written the Agricultural Easement as an Open Space Easement and requires that Malibu Valley Farms obtain an additional permit for any and all agricultural activities.  The ramifications of this go beyond Malibu Valley Farms because this permit will be used as precedent for agricultural easements once this is passed.

 

 Here is the language being proposed by the Staff:

 

Agricultural Easement

 

A.     No development, as defined in Section 30106 of the Coastal Act, shall occur in the Agricultural Easement Area as shown on Exhibit 29 except for:

 

1.      Restoration, protection and enhancement of native habitat and/or sensitive resources;

2.     Existing livestock fencing as shown on Exhibit 29.

 

AND

 

3.      The following development, if approved by the Coastal Commission as an amendment to the coastal development permit:

•        Agricultural production activities as defined as “activities that are directly related to the cultivation of agricultural products for sale.  Agricultural products are limited to food and fiber in their raw unprocessed state, and ornamental plant material.

•        Agricultural support facilities directly related to the cultivation of food, fiber and ornamental plants being undertaken on the site.

•        Maintaining livestock

 

B.     Prior to the issuance of the Coastal Development Permit, the applicant shall execute and record a document in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director, granting to a public agency or private association approved by the Executive Director an agricultural conservation easement over the “agricultural easement area” described above, for the purpose of preventing development or improvement of the land for purposes other than agricultural production, and thus ensuring that the land remains in its historical, agricultural, forested or open-space condition.  The recorded easement shall include a formal legal description of the entire property; and a metes and bounds legal description and graphic depiction, prepared by a licensed surveyor, of the agricultural easement area, as generally shown on Exhibit 29.  The recorded document shall reflect that no development shall occur within the agricultural easement area except as otherwise set forth in this permit condition.  The offer shall be recorded free of prior liens and encumbrances which the Executive Director determines may affect the interest being conveyed.

 

There are several egregious aspects to what the Coastal Staff is trying to do:

 

1.    The only things permitted under the Staff’s version of an agricultural easement is native or sensitive habitat.  This is not agriculture, this is an open space conservation easement.   Staff is trying to redefine agriculture to be the same as open space.

 

2.   Agricultural activities require a separate permit – they are trying to take away the rights you have in an agricultural area and make you go back and ask permission to do those same things.

 

3.  In addition to calling a portion of the property an “agricultural area” – the Staff has gone a major step further.  In Section B they are stating that Malibu Valley Farms must grant an agricultural conservation easement over the agricultural area to a public agency or private association approved by Peter Douglas for the purpose of making sure the property is not used for anything other than agriculture production.  Horses are not agriculture production and will never be allowed in an agriculture area.

 

4.  I have attached a copy of Exhibit 29 which is referenced in the condition that Staff wrote.  In looking at it you will see that the Agricultural Easement Area is nowhere near the creek that was at issue in the original permit.  This isn’t about horses near creeks, this is about horses, period.

 

Staff did not want Malibu Valley Farms to be issued a permit.  And they lost that battle – so now they are doing everything they can to make sure horses are not agriculture.  They are once again trying to stop people from having horses in the Coastal Zone.  Throughout the state, there are historical agricultural uses and horses have always been included.  Now, Staff is taking the bold and clear stance that horses are not agriculture, and by the way, if you are in an agricultural area, the only right you have is to grow sensitive habitat.

 

If Staff gets their way, all areas declared to be agriculture will be limited to preservation of sensitive habitat.

 

The Staff is at it again and this time they are going against the Coastal Commissioners themselves.  The Commissioners approved an agricultural area, not a conservation area.  Staff did not write this recommendation based on what the Commissioners wanted.  Please do not let Staff win this one.  The horse community showed their strength and unity last year, and it is time to do it again.  This issue is not about Malibu Valley Farms – this is how Staff is trying to redefine agriculture – and take away all of your horses and rights.  Please tell the Commissioners that agricultural rights are to be protected and that horses are agriculture.

 

Please send letters to:


California Coastal Commission

89 South California Street, Suite 200

Ventura, CA 93001

(805) 641-1732

 

Reference Application No. 4-06-163

 

I was asked to prepare a sample support letter, which I have also included.  Please feel free to use this letter or create your own.

 

Thank you and as always, please pass this along and please feel free to contact me with any questions.  The Staff report is on the Coastal Commission’s website and can be read there.

 

Beth Palmer

 

Beth Palmer

Malibu Valley Farms, Inc.

26885 Mulholland Highway

Calabasas, California  91302

Phone:  (818) 880-5139

Fax:      (818) 880-5414

beth@malibuvalley.com

 

 

February 6, 2007

Immigration An Issue With Many Facets

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidhernandez @ 10:47 pm

 

 

The United States is a nation of immigrants and will always be a haven for those who want an opportunity for a better life. However, immigration has become a divisive issue in our country. Let’s look at some of the aspects of this issue. 

Positions on how we as a nation deal with current immigration problems vary widely: from total isolation to open borders; from tight restrictions to no restrictions on the provision of services.  

Some groups address the issue by promoting anger and hatred towards the United States and its non-minority population under the banner of restoring the Southwest to its rightful ownership. They forget that every nation in the world is a nation of immigrants, and that identifying the original inhabitants of any place in the world is a near impossibility. We would have to go back thousands of years, and documents don’t exist that far back.  

Our education system, by direct or indirect means, promotes the thought that large groups of people are victims, and in doing so divides the community. They blame taxpayers and ignore the fact that U.S. taxpayers are very willing to help others. We provide more money and help to our own citizens and to other countries than any nation on earth. (Parenthetically, we also do more volunteer and charitable work than any other citizens on earth.) Clearly, paying more taxes will not gain appreciation. The people who are denying services to others are the increasing numbers of those competing for a piece of the pie.  

They also forget that every time you provide a permanent source of money to solve a temporary problem, you turn it into a permanent problem. We have created a nation of permanent victims. An atmosphere of specious entitlement, which by legislation attempts to redress grievances of the past at the expense of the present, causes more division among the community.  

Responding to frustrations and fears, real or imagined, other groups react to years of compromise and neglect. Attempts are made to restrict access to education, healthcare and other social services in order to protect limited resources.  

As the unchecked population continues to flood the limited job market, it causes those on the lower levels of employment to suffer the loss of a wage base or of benefits.  

 

Special interest groups see the immigration issue as a vehicle to increase their influence and power. 

Some employers see the opportunity to lower overhead and depress wages for those who are willing to work for less. All parties involved promote a negative effect on employees, most of whom are of the same ethnic background.  

 

Government’s Responsibility 

A sovereign country has the right and the responsibility to secure its borders. In securing its borders a country can and must use any legal method available to accomplish this vital task.  

Government has the responsibility to provide for the security and safety of its people and institutions. The first obligation of the government must be to those who by birth or legal avenues are entitled to services, education, employment or financial considerations.  

The right to vote is one which came at great cost and is still not available to millions throughout the globe. This precious right cannot and must not be diminished by those who, for selfish reasons, would ignore its value. 

All countries are obligated to provide basic services, education,  and job opportunities to their citizens. It is unfair to expect the United States to do the job that other countries fail to do.  

 

The Consequences of Uncontrolled Borders 

For every compromise, there is a negative result. Unlimited access to the U.S. removes burdens from the shoulders of other governments and places them on the shoulders of our own children. How can this possibly be fair? Our own children, who have the right to receive the best we can provide, endure larger class sizes, fewer class offerings, higher college fees, and diminished opportunities.  

Uncontrolled population growth causes the need for more and more schools. The effort to provide schools has spurred an endless line of tax-raising schemes and the confiscation of homes and businesses to acquire land in residential neighborhoods. In spite of this, our schools are filled to capacity, preventing our youngest citizens from attending school in their own neighborhood.  

At the community college level, the number of those refused entry due to filled capacity is in the thousands. Attendance fees are increased. Access to grants, scholarships and loan programs are limited to a certain number, and the result is a system which discriminates against those who should be the first considered for those limited funds.  

 

We want the best for all children, but is it right for our own children to be deprived in order to service children neglected by other countries?  

Our health care system is another example of the consequences of carelessly monitored borders. Due to massive cuts and a lack of proper planning, many facilities have cut services or closed. The result has been a disaster to our communities. In the past fifteen years 40% of the hospitals in the San Fernando Valley have closed. Clinic after clinic has closed. County hospitals have inhumane emergency room processing times. This loss of treatment is closely followed by the loss of jobs. The costs of treating illegal immigrants is estimated to be $320,000,000 per year at the county level alone. The cost to the private sector is still being totaled.  

The effects on public safety can only be estimated, but there are facts which cannot be denied: Twenty-five percent of those incarcerated in the Los Angeles jail system are in this country illegally. These individuals are not being held on grounds of their immigrant status. They have committed crimes for which they have been or are being convicted. What are the results of a 25% inmate population influx? Due to limited space, inmates are not required to serve a full or fair portion of their sentence. These criminals are released back into our communities and, with limited or meaningless deterrents; prey on our citizens with little regard for the consequences.  

Our police officers and limited enforcement resources are stretched to the maximum, causing calls for assistance to either go unanswered or result in unacceptable waiting periods. Mexican nationals who commit capital crimes and flee to Mexico cannot be extradited back to the United States. However, those who commit non-capital crimes can be returned, so there is an incentive for criminals to avoid extradition by committing more severe crimes.  

A real, but seldom mentioned, consequence is the culture which exists in the world of those living in the shadows of illegality. They are prey to human vultures that rape, rob, murder and leave them for dead in an isolated desert or mountain terrain. On a routine basis, individuals are found dead of exposure or abandoned in locked trucks or trailers.  

These conditions are rarely addressed by those who propose legislation to gain the support of special interest groups. Nor will they be solved by the political schemes of such vested interests.  

Addressing the Problems of Immigration 

There is no clear and easy solution to the problems of immigration, but there are beginnings which can and must be implemented.  

·         First of all, secure our southern border. We must have and implement the options of stationary deterrents, law enforcement and military personnel.·         Interior enforcement must also be implemented. We cannot have millions of unidentified non-citizens in our country.·         A viable method of identification must be developed for non-citizens. This involves walking a careful line to avoid requiring a national identity card for valid citizens. Totalitarian governments are notorious for requiring national identity cards. ·         In finding a way to identify non-citizens, we must not rely on governments who stand to gain by exporting their unwanted or under-served populations. ·         A humane but determined program of deportation must be enacted. This program must not be influenced by groups who place their own special interests ahead of the country’s well-being. ·         Attempts by local governments, city councils, county supervisors, and police administrators to circumvent federal regulations must be challenged and overridden. ·         Funding for projects which are in direct opposition to the rule of law must be challenged and deterred. ·         Institutions which are funded by public monies must be required to stop using public funding for non-emergency programs and services for illegal aliens. ·         A centrally-located system to process new citizenship applications must be established to ensure and encourage the process of legal entry.·         Employers, who violate the law by their hiring practices, must be deterred and held accountable.·         A full review of current procedures must be implemented to determine their effectiveness and future need.  

Our current process of reacting to immigration issues is so disjointed that in trying to be all things to all people we are short-changing our own citizens. Implementing the above steps will be a powerful start to bringing cohesiveness to this issue. Clarity and cohesive action will bring positive results for all.  

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.